Skip to content

Boulevards of Death

What? Are you saying the Dancing Sausage Web Journal has absolutely no editorial vision to speak of? Why would you say that? Is it because I’m linking to the ten most dangerous intersections in the United States, and Queens Boulevard isn’t even on there? Yeah, you’re probably right.

Adventures in Communication: Bulleted Lists

This week’s jihad: Men who insist that women leave an elevator first, even when they are closer to the door than the women are. An absurd number of men in the building where I work do this. I have consciously avoided giving any indication that I was eager to leave the elevator, hanging back at the handrail on the wall, and even with this noticeable pause they still make a gesture to the door and won’t walk out until I do.

I don’t mind certain forms of politeness; for example, I don’t mind people holding doors open for each other — I do it for other women, they do it for me, we do it for men, men do it for us, everyone does it for the guy with no arms or the woman pushing a stroller — but this is a highly gendered form of “politeness,” and it’s dumb and slows everyone down and I hate it. I’m trying to work up a good comment. What I have so far (none of it is particularly witty, which frustrates me):

  • “Are you trying to get a good look at my ass? I’m sorry, I can’t help but think that when you’re closer to the door than I am and you want me to exit first.”
  • (while pushing him, imperiously) “Out of my way — my two X chromosomes need to be off the elevator before your Y does, or there may be A CRISIS!”
  • or “You know, they’ve discovered that being female isn’t actually a medical condition. I’m in no hurry.”
  • “Would you offer to let me go first if I was a guy?”
  • “Would you still offer to let me go first if you knew I was a transvestite?”
  • “I think it’s less rude if you go first.”
  • or simply, “You’re closer to the door than I am.”

None of these really sum up my continually unfulfilled desire to simply be seen as a thinking, productive, non-sexual entity by the people around me who I am not looking to fu(k (i.e. 99.999% of the population). It being nearly summer again in New York, I’m wearing less clothing for the sake of being comfortable, and I am sort of disgusted by how much time I spend angrily stewing my comeback lines so I have a fresh steaming one ready for the next a$shole who whistles at me. Come on, men of New York. Guys in other cities aren’t half so bad as you are. Settle the fu(k down.

(This jihad was inspired in part by one woman’s thoughts on men sitting on subway seats with their legs spread as if their test!cles were as big as their heads. I think she’s entirely right, and I would add that the societal expectation that women sit with their legs crossed makes for excessively tippy subway riding.)

* * *

My absolute least favorite people to interview are small-time government officials. I imagine the same is true of many big-time government officials. It’s nearly impossible to get them to give you a meaningful quote. This morning I called a guy at a Coney Island governance organization for this article I’m doing, and he gave me nothing but a mouthful of cliches. This may be a matter of my own failure in interviewing; I wanted to get a picture of what Coney Island means to him in the kind of the warm, personal, quirky terms that I was supposedly trained to evince as a literary journalist, but even when I asked how the C.I. boardwalk physically looks different in the wake of economic development, he heaped comments about his mother “giving back to the community” on top of pabulum about the local schools having a “children-first philosophy” and garnished it with cream about how people in Coney Island “work together and have a team attitude.” I gave up.

* * *

And now, a public service. The following doctors have REALLY BAD HANDWRITING:

  • Edward J. Kinkopf of Centerville, OH
  • Stanley Dziedzic of New York, NY
  • Richard Wolin of Williamsville, NY

These people are in the job of communicating the nature of ills to other people, in the interest of of remedying them. They really ought to have good handwriting, and they don’t. Fix it, guys. Further bulletins as I identify more doctors with REALLY BAD HANDWRITING.

Detritus: Physical Attributes of Queens, etc.

This is the time of year and violent quality of weather which brings a sidewalk death to baby birds. I see them everywhere, in agonized jags underfoot. It adds a certain horror to the city’s usual sidewalk litter.

* * *

I think I wrote something recently about the New York tendency not to consider anything beyond a three-block neighborhood of your dwelling “your neighborhood.” Mostly this is an imagined boundary. But Roger and I were out walking tonight in Sunnyside and we found the end of the universe, the beginning of the Nothing, the place where you expect to see the giant bats and the warping of the fabric of space. It’s 39th Avenue, I think.

* * *

Today I went to the open house at Teacher’s College. (I did mention I’m going to Columbia, right?) Lots of excitement over it, but the two things I want to talk about (in the Eqbal Ahmad sense) are thusly:

Remembering my first day of Hampshire — and to some extent other beginnings in my life — while sitting in the balcony during the TC administration’s welcome was something. Even though I’m not sure yet whether this degree is what I want to pursue, I feel like I’ve made a much more clear-headed, better-informed decision this time around. From this vantage point I feel like I wasn’t even a sentient being when I applied to Hampshire. I went there for all the wrong reasons, most of them social. I came in with so many doubts and expectations of the place and myself. I remember being all pumped up about being one of the smartest students there, which was completely ridiculous on Hampshire’s terms even if it wasn’t yet unimportant on my own. It was very important to me that I prove myself. I don’t even know on what terms, except that I guess I wanted to be recognized as a writer. Published in the New Yorker, maybe, because that’s what you do when you’re the best writer. Aside from that, all I really wanted was for my teachers to praise me, as they always had, because that’s who I was: no more than the sum of my teachers’ praise. I wanted fellow students worthy of my love — not just a small group, the whole batch.

(The professors frequently offered praise as a reward for no effort at all, and resistance in places that baffled me (why did the child development professor refuse to let me write an assignment where we were supposed to do a drawing? why wouldn’t Michael Lesy comment on my essay’s stylistics?). While more of the students were interesting than my high school classmates, my circle remained as limited as it had been.)

This time, I have it thought out. I have a few ridiculous aspirations which will probably fall by the wayside — mostly about the total overhaul of the world’s educational systems — but I also have a list of practical skills I want to develop along the way. I know why I’m going to school: I want a multidisciplinary environment, and I wants me my praxis. And I want the three doctoral letters tacked onto my name, because I’m tired of being pushed around on the job.

As I wrote “GUS” in bigger letters than the rest of my name on my nametag today I remembered how the teachers at Hampshire gleefully grabbed onto that name and used it vigorously, resisting Gillian in what seemed like a sense that turnabout on the first-name-basis of the college was fair play. I had a dim awareness, as I spelled the three letters out again, that I was making a choice I hadn’t thought to consider. It wasn’t until I got to campus this time that I thought about how I was presenting myself. My debut on the Hampshire campus was so thought-out that I can still remember what I wore that day: it was fetching, but not like something anyone else would wear. I feel blessed that I’ve made it to the stage where I’m spending more time sussing out my new bunkmates than I am considering how I want to come off.

* * *

Certain displays of weakness in men, I can handle. Others I find so terrifying as to want to avoid those who exhibit them. I am still figuring out which, by trial and error.

Memory-Limited, or, From the Hip

Went running today. My dad, an inveterate marathoner, used to encourage us to note whether we were leg-limited or lung-limited during a given run; it’s only recently that this kind of take on a body has to me seemed limited. In dance class, I am frequently space-limited, back-limited, or arm-limited. Running must be about something more, too. I remember Li-Young Lee talking about a given poem of his coming from his rib, or from his hip. Surely running has a more spiritual side.

Anyway, today I was neither leg- nor lung-limited; I was pavement-limited. I took what must have been the digger of my life over on 44th Street when I jammed my right foot into a loop of my left shoelace. I scraped my palms, elbow, shoulder, shin, knee, and hip. I think that adds up to more points of landing than the time JT and I crash-landed near the Washington Monument.

To my memory, that was the only unpleasant part of my visit with him in DC, or even the entire summer before I entered college. The sex was good; he’d been writing me profound letters on a frequent basis; he sent me little gifts and I reciprocated; his mom and stepdad had flown me out and I was enjoying spending time with them; Kube came up and visited and we baptized ourselves at the Watergate. A fun time was had by all, I thought.

So it was kind of a rude shock to find that not only was this guy who I’d considered one of the greater loves of my life blogging unbeknownst to me, but he also had a totally different take on that particular period of time. (Inexact linkage; look for the April 18 post, or do a search for “Jill” on the page.)

I don’t know how to take it, exactly. He had a big crush on someone else; he hadn’t mentioned that. Was he lying to me? I’d never thought of him as a liar. Frank and thoughtful, yes. A liar, no.

Then again, memory warps in time, faster than glass does. Was my recollection of that time wrong, or was his? The DC trip was about eight years ago; maybe we’re both wrong about what it was like. Time for some reconceptualization. I’d also always presumed I meant as much to him as he had to me, a preconception which that post and others took apart. It had already proved a dangerous presumption — about three years ago, in some fit of crudely-conceived empowerment, I experimentally asked him to marry me. He backed off speaking in the kind of “nice doggie” tone you use to augment your use of a big stick against a menacing dog. My head was pretty hazy at that point with low-self-esteem in the depressurization period after college, so I probably was too into myself to read him well; I never guessed how that stunt would impact what I read as bemusement in him.

Still, I thought I knew him. There is a terrible thing about going to the kind of school where the same people are together for twelve years or more: you come to think these people belong to you. They are symbols for you to play with. They have meanings which in some ways are the clearest possible distillation of who they are, and yet do not begin to touch who they are. Your meaning fits together with theirs, even if it is not anything like theirs; it can be an opposition, or a complement. And then everyone moves away, and the substance behind those meanings dissolves. For highly affective people like me, the shell of the meaning remains. I think it only gets in the way.

You’re From Coney Island, And Little Coney Island Is Famous For You

So I’ve been assigned to write an article about Coney Island. That includes the Sideshow, Mermaid Parade, burlesque reviews, the local “polar bear” swimmers group, possibly the local subway, and Bambi the Mermaid. And maybe the Russian community in the area? I should be so lucky! I am in hog fuckin’ heaven. The catch? I get 750 words, and I also have to talk about economic development. Boo.

The Dancing Sausage Comeback Special

You’ve fallen victim to the crazy hijinks of one of my less pleasant moods. The Dancing Sausage Web Journal isn’t going anywhere! That wacky premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Always keeping things “interesting.” Bet you were fooled!

(sound of crickets)

I promise I didn’t do it for the attention. I was genuinely freaking out. All I’ve probably done is chased away my regular audience… counterproductive.

* * *

Fox recently aired a Beverly Hills 90210 reunion and a “Now-It-Can-Be-Told”-style dramatization of the Three’s Company cast in rapid succession. While my stomach churned, I thought how nice it is that the Internet makes bullsh!t like that unecessary. I mean, think about it. Nobody is ever going to do a Homestar Runner reunion, for example; the whole oeuvre will (hopefully) be right there on the Web for time immemorial, barring the progression of the right-wing coup to total repression of free speech. If we see something like, it’ll be a spoof of the kind of “reunion special” which makes some halfwit sitcom out to be a great cultural touchstone in which everyone participated (which, of course, The Simpsons has already done). Or maybe TV will be forced to do retrospectives of things like 2001’s AYBABTU craze, instead. I can just picture some grey-haired, baseball-jacketed network producers scratching their heads and going “Who the hell gives a shit?”

* * *

New Yorkers, I mean the born-and-bred-and-raised-and-dyed-hard-in-the-wool-type New Yorkers, are CRAZY. I mean CRAAAAAAYZEEEE. They have a warped, twisted worldview inexplicable to the rest of us. I got a call today from a woman running a boostery kind of a magazine in Brooklyn, who said she’d seen my writing and loved my style, and would I like to do some articles for her? The first one she wanted me to do was about Coney Island, and how it has undergone a rebirth in the past little while… in passing, she mentioned the carnival freakshow, the burlesque show, the Mermaid Parade, the polar bear swim club that meets there, and the “unofficial mayor of Coney Island.” All the while she was hemming and hawing, going, Well, seeing as you live in Queens and you’re from California, you probably don’t have an affinity for this story or for Brooklyn.

Let’s take that again in slow motion: She saw my work — which has ranged from pieces on dumpster diving to a performance artist who does an opera he wrote in a language he made up — and she thinks I wouldn’t have an affinity for this story. I’m twenty-six; I have to have an affinity for Brooklyn whether I live there or not. All the good stuff happens there. All the cool kids live there. (When buddy Rob Domingo and I went out the other day to run a half-mile with two giant chickens and their devoted flock of young crazies, he estimated that Williamsburg must have been totally deserted.)

Granted, you can’t get to Brooklyn from here; the G train is a$s and everything else goes through Manhattan. But Coney Island is still the only beach in the city I go to. I was in the Mermaid Parade last year. And she bets that because I live in Queens I won’t have an affinity for the story. I can only chalk this up to the New York mindset that anything outside a three-block radius of your house is Not My Neighborhood.

I told her the only borough I don’t have an affinity with is Staten Island, and I’m taking on the story. She assigned me two articles, actually, both of which sound fun. Various things are coming up Milhouse.

* * *

When I wondered about the ethics of doctors, Catherine sent me a link to the Onion’s “Zoloft for Everything” article. Perfect timing; it reads so much like the stuff I see at work.

Working in the bosom of Big Pharm is making me think. The pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder (is there really such a diagnosis? it’s definitely what I have) was really bad this month, longer than usual and involving a few paralyzing crying jags and a sh!tload of unfocused anxiety. Sifting through the doctors’ diagnoses at work, I start to think, Gee, some people deal with depression as if it could be made to go away. I gave up on that a while ago. None of the social workers at Hampshire helped me any. I think I figured on my own that I was more depressed the week before my period — four years ago, which was after about three years of mostly blaming my violent mood swings on my boyfriends, or else riding them out in terror that my body and mind were so unreliable.

It was about four years ago, too, that I told Catherine what I’d figured out about my depressive spells. She said Wow, that’s a quarter of your life. I wouldn’t want to spend a quarter of my life that way.

I mistrust. I have seen people who have taken Prozac up close, and watched them struggle with how it made them feel. I know someone who took Ritalin as a kid, and he has all sorts of weird vestigial compulsive behaviors and doesn’t open up to you. I don’t think drugs can just make these things go away.

I have taught myself, for the most part, to deal with the dysphoria. I remind myself to take things with a grain of salt during that week, as I may well be overreacting. I treat myself a little more gently. Experimentation with placebos — whoops, herbal remedies — seems to have helped a great deal, as have attention to my sleep habits, getting excercise, and making sure I take my usual vitamin supplement. (My serious depression kicked in at the beginning of my second year of college; I have wondered if this is related to the anemia I probably developed when I went vegetarian in the months before.)

The very knowledge that I’m pulling myself out of a tailspin seems to improve my mood greatly. In the same vein, I would also like to try biofeedback, though nobody seems to do that much anymore. I would really like to do without the drugs.

At the same time, these episodes are so violent that they sometimes make permanent marks on my life. I can’t rely upon myself to make major decisions in these weeks. And the continuation of my dark spells as the years go by shakes my faith in myself, which for an aware leftist is sometimes the only thing there is to have faith in.

Panthers, in flagrante delicto

Today Robert Durff sent a link to a story in CNN about the arrest of Katrina Leung, an alleged Chinese double agent, which, he alluded, had something to do with our high school in Pasadena. I scanned the entire article and was mystified by the connection — the story had a Los Angeles dateline, but that was about it — until I looked a little more carefully and realized that the man who was her FBI handler was in fact wearing a Poly Panthers hat in an accompanying picture. Catherine did a little more digging and discovered that not only was the FBI agent a Poly parent, but the double agent was as well.

Both spies are up on charges — he is accused of handing off important documents to her, as they were apparently lovers. This kind of drama is sort of par for the course in Pasadena; the town is lousy with all sorts of questionable love affairs. (Scientology, if I recollect rightly, was founded on the wealth of a Caltech professor’s wife who left her husband for L. Ron Hubbard.) The real surprise is hearing, out in the open, about Poly parents’ dizzyingly global roles. This is the most intrigue to hit the school since “Mrs. Robinson” (the famous one, not the one who was our math teacher).

The Star News article calls Leung a “prominent political activist,” while the CNN story calls her a “prominent Chinese-American businesswoman.” I can’t help but wonder which is more accurate, and what both of those lines of work entailed… No, no, wait — I see now! CNN says she was a Republican fundraiser!

Notes From The Bowels Of A Pharmaceuticals Advertising Company

Beautiful� I just want you to know� You�re my favorite girl�

My supervisor’s station plays it every day. I swear, if I hear it one more time� It induces a Groundhog Day feeling about the workday. Total hysteria, deep nagging questions about the meaning of life. Script by Harold Ramis. But I digress.

* * *

�Gillian, I love your hair! Every day a new style.� I got the exact same comment yesterday as today. It freaks me out, powerfully, as �style� implies some kind of forethought or planning. I showered last night, slept on my hair, and literally did not comb it at all this morning. I did not subject my hair to even milliseconds of being in the same room as a comb, even.

I want to say something like, Like it? My stylist is up on 72nd Street� His name is Max N�Aux, and the studio is N�Aux Kombe Hair Styles� I can�t quite figure out how to make that gag work when it�s not in writing, though.

Would they be offended? They�re always commenting on each other�s clothes and shoes and hair. I�d like to say this commercial environment evinces more comments on my wardrobe, but it�s not really any different from the nonprofits or universities where I�ve worked. Abby was always going on about my hair, even when it wasn�t purple, and the harpies in the Bronx, comfortable in their own pathetic, low-budget concessions to style, chuckled over what they called “the return of the gypsy look” when I came to work in a broomstick-pleat skirt.

Today someone asked my boss, who looks like she�s maybe ten years younger than my mom, whether she was a child of the 80s. No, she said, mustering annoyance at the speaker�s misperception; she was being pegged as younger than she really is, which might be flattering if it wasn’t by an incongruous twenty years or so. I�m a child of the sixties, she said. Tie-dye, bell-bottoms.

Was that all it was to you?

This is the same woman who was all excited because her husband is buying a Harley-Davidson � �just because I can say he rides a Harley.� I wanted to tell her if he really wanted to make an impression she should get him to buy a Moto Guzzi or a Ducati, but for some people cool only runs so deep.

* * *

Captain Picard was right. I fucking love Earl Grey. There�s this moment at about � of the way through the cup if I�m going slowly where I just start thinking how much I love people, and I know it�s kicking in. I don�t know how many people would be maimed if I couldn�t get any.

Teamaking in this office is high-tech and mysterious. You get a nondairy-creamer-like plastic tub of tea (there are similar tubs of gourmet coffee) which you insert into a machine, put a cup underneath, press a button, and it dispenses a perfectly-brewed cup. No teabags to save to pretend you will brew a second cup later. No steeping to your twisted predilection for tannin burns on your tonsils. Just a plastic cup which the machine sucks into itself for safekeeping. There’s something unholy about it.

* * *

Much of what I do here is decode doctors� handwriting on surveys. The legends of its illegibility are true. I�m kind of shocked, though, because I thought they were taking classes these days to improve it. I mean, it�s probably worse than usual, because who can be bothered to fill out a survey? Maybe it�s the only concession they�re making to the fact that the conferences they�re reviewing are obvious shills for an anti-insomnia drug which I will call Oblivien.

There�s a question on the survey that asks them to rate how objective and scientifically rigorous the presentations are. Almost all of them rank them completely or almost completely rigorous. This is frightening. I have heard my boss describe our division over the phone as �an educational company,� but it is an arm of an advertising firm. If these surveys are in my hands, in this office, it is evidence the conferences are marketing tools.

They work, too. The doctors get paid $250 to attend these “symposia,” and they get wined and dined at swanky restaurants. A number of doctors write that they will use more Oblivien as a result of what the �faculty� at these events tell them. The overwhelming majority of them rank the presentations 4 or 5 on a one (not objective) to five (absolutely objective) scale. I’ve snooped into the PowerPoint presentations the speakers use (and surprisingly, only one doctor complained that the tone of the lecture was aimed too low), but it’s hard to judge what is actually said at the symposia; I can’t help but wonder how overt they are about pushing the drug. I have to hope the doctors are too smart for this bullshit, and what they say on the surveys is just an attempt to flatter the company so they can get another free lunch.

At one point in the survey, attendees are asked to describe a typical insomnia case in their practice. The question doesn’t end “for which you would prescribe Oblivien,” but a few of the doctors supply that they would use it. The cases they describe are wildly diverse: workers on the swing shift, patients with fibromyalgia, homesick college students, and depressives already on a cocktail of five drugs which leaves them agitated.

Some of the doctors paint elaborate, almost lurid scenarios in response to this prompt; one said he’d prescribe the drug to a middle-aged man under stress, who has been served papers by a wife he didn’t know was cheating on him. You see this range of detail and grow even more certain they’re looking to medicate away the rough edges of life.

One set of doctors say they plan to prescribe the drug for long-term use despite the fact that the drug is indicated for short-term use. Meanwhile, doctors from another lecture say they’ll only use it briefly while easing patients onto anti-depressants. A third set of doctors, blessedly, register questions about the appropriateness of long-term use. But the lack of consensus is alarming, especially when one doctor says he’ll use one class of drugs for children, while another says he would never do so due to side-effects.

Beyond spelling, the doctors can�t seem to be bothered to read questions. They give cryptic one-word answers open to interpretation. They answer �yes� to questions that ask for descriptions. Their grammar is positively atrocious. So much for twenty years of school.

I have a number of friends who are just now finishing up med school. I want to ask them: Does anyone in their schools talk about how drug companies further their interests? How much skepticism are they encouraged to have?

I just sit back and hope most of these doctors who appear to be so enthusiastic about the drug are just being facetious.

* * *

Periodically my supervisors and the office manager coo over how efficiently I work. We liked the girl who was here before you, don�t get us wrong, they say, but it took her a day to tabulate a survey you do in an hour. I wonder what took her so long? they say, shaking their heads.

I wonder where her blog is? I think.

Problems with comments

A couple of you have written to me today saying you’ve had trouble posting comments to the site. One of you even thought he had the solution 😉 I’ve made a minor adjustment to my IP banning in hopes that will change things… Try again, let me know if it works, and if not, what specifically is not working (left column, center column, posting from home/work/nude/whatever). If this doesn’t work I’ll check in with Kellan again on how to make it stop.

In other news, the bigbig project I have been working on is almost done… all that stands between me and posting it is conversion of an interview into some workable audio format (any suggestions? I don’t know how to do streaming. I have HyperEngine to work with).

The Secret Lives of Want Ads

When I was in my impressionable pre-teen years, my mother and her also-recently-divorced roommate, Lennox, would periodically sit at the table and read classified ads aloud. They would make a game of decoding the hidden meanings of the ads. Most people are familiar with this code as it applies to real-estate ads: “cozy” means cramped, “lots of parking” means the yard has been paved over, “restorer’s dream” means the place is totally run down, etc.

Mom and Lennox also decoded the personals ads. “Seeing SWF for good times” indicated the guy was afraid of commitment, and possibly also racist. Any man who opted to represent himself as someone who honestly liked candlelight dinners and long walks on the beach was either completely boring or trying to mask some serious social shortcoming.

But then, most personals ads in papers — before the advent of the longer, more evocative ads that web dating services make possible — were pretty uniform. I remember my mom getting a good, unironic chuckle out of an ad which rhymed; part of it ran “Lots of smarts, rarely farts.” I was heartened by this. When I couldn’t convince her to leave a message for the guy herself, I snuck a moment when she was out of our shared bedroom to call and leave a message. (It led with something like “Hi, my mom really liked your ad, but she’s too shy to call…”)

Lately I feel like I’ve been seeing the same subtle or not-so-subtle messages in job ads. Witness:

“Individual must have excellent communication skills”

Read: A former employee snapped at a client and caused an international incident. Please don’t make us relive that scene.

Proofreader/copyeditor needed… in fast-paced Office of Communications to work closely with production artist.

Read: If you can’t handle the production artist’s caprice about sudden changes to the layout and tendency to blame someone else when she neglects details, forget it.

Similarly:

Must be able to work well under deadline pressure, enjoy teamwork, and take direction.

Read: We will give you more work than you can reasonably be expected to handle, and blame you when you don’t finish it. If you don’t get along with us personally, you’re fired. Don’t even think of challenging our directions.

This is an exciting position for a creative and energetic technology activist who is committed to social justice.

Read: “Social justice” clues those of us who are left of the Democrats (we call it “progressive;” the term “liberal” is generally viewed as a dirty word) in to the fact that the people at this organization are doing work that is more openly political, has a more systematic social critique, or possibly works further outside the political and grantmaking establishment than your average nonprofit/charity. People who don’t understand these distinctions will find themselves alienated by — or alienating to — their co-workers in this job.

Meanwhile, “energetic” suggests that you will be given little to go on, have to make your duties up yourself, and be viewed with suspicion if you ask for support.

The ideal candidate is excited by the potential of bringing an understanding of government and political action to young people

Read: By contrast, “government and political action” suggests an organization that seeks to work inside the system. Don’t bring your civil disobedience tactics here.

Women and people of color are strongly encouraged to apply.

Read: I’m going to take shit for saying this, but I’ve watched it happen: If you’re white, especially if you’re white and male, don’t expect to get this job. The New York City nonprofit establishment tries to make up for the glass ceiling in the private sector by keeping itself female, and thinks its clients will be better served by people of color. On the latter, I think they’re mostly right. How ensuring that nonprofits remain a female-dominated ghetto helps anyone is beyond me.

Seeking a hip and young freelancer to write articles, copy, and content for a local ISP in New York… Good chance for an unpublished net-marketing-copywriter to find a home. You don’t have to be Hemmingway [sic] or James Joyce, but some sense of style and grammtical correctness is a plus.

Read: We have no idea what we’re doing; we just need someone to fill space. Our ears are totally made of tin. And we wouldn’t know Hemingway if he turned up as a zombie and bit us hard on the ass and turned us all into bluntly-spoken zombies (BRAIN. I EAT HIM BRAIN BUT GOOD) with an unholy urge to go out and fill the world with Great American Novels.